ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Missaukee County, Michigan

FIPS 26113 · Cadillac, MI · Population 15,207
9 Sources Updated June 22, 2026
$66,194
Median Income
$80,734 national
5.7%
Unemployment
4% national
$678M
GDP
18.8%
Bachelor's+
35.7% national
Small population: 15,207 residents. These figures come from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey 5-year estimates, which carry a wide margin of error for places under 20,000 people. Read each value as an approximate range, and treat year-over-year changes as indicative rather than exact. A small shift can reflect survey sampling, not a real change on the ground.

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household
$66,194
Per Capita
$32,706
Mean Household
$83,075
Poverty Rate
11.3% approx.
Median Income Comparison
Missaukee County$66,194
Michigan$72,875
National$80,734

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 22% (3,341 residents) 55-64: 15.3% (2,322 residents) 35-54: 22% (3,353 residents) 18-34: 18.5% (2,809 residents) Under 18: 22.2% (3,382 residents) 43 Median Age
Cohorts
Under 18 · 22.2%
18-34 · 18.5%
35-54 · 22%
55-64 · 15.3%
65+ · 22%
Race & Ethnicity
White91.7%
Black or African American0.3%
Asian0.5%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)3.4%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
91.1%
High School+
National: 89.6%
▲ +1.5 pts
18.8%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
▼ 16.9 pts
6%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
▼ 8.1 pts

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
15,207
Population
7,072
Labor Force
Employed
6,595
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
5.7% ▲ +0.4 pts YoY
Mean Commute 2 min below national avg
24.5 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.2%
Key Takeaways
  • Income gap: Households earn meaningfully less than the national median, which directly affects retail demand, housing absorption, and tax base.
  • Talent gap: Bachelor's-or-higher attainment trails the national average by 16.9 pts, relevant for advanced-services attraction strategy.
  • Aging population: Median age of 43 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$678M
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · CAGDP1 Regional GDP

Top Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual
Top industries by employment in Missaukee County, Michigan, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting
870 30.7%
$47,155
2Manufacturing
650 22.9%
$63,836
3Retail Trade
586 20.7%
$36,902
4Transportation and Warehousing
211 7.4%
$54,564
5Construction
204 7.2%
$59,617
6Other Services (except Public Administration)
116 4.1%
$45,688
7Administrative and Support and Waste Management
67 2.4%
$16,224
8Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
62 2.2%
$48,359
9Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
36 1.3%
$72,858
10Finance and Insurance
31 1.1%
$55,778
Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest sector: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting employs 870 workers (30.7% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $47,155.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $678M (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction averages $72,858 while Administrative and Support and Waste Management averages $16,224, a 4.5x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Concentrated Industries
Source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · Location Quotient vs. national employment share
Same source as the Top Industries table above, sub-sector view surfaces the specialization the supersector view masks (e.g., Plastics & Rubber Manufacturing inside the Manufacturing supersector).
Animal Production and Aquaculture
48.06x
343
Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
37.71x
378
Wood Product Manufacturing
18.08x
192
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
3.68x
102
General Merchandise Retailers
3.38x
289
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
3.19x
289
2.94x
1,761
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
2.89x
109
Truck Transportation
2.53x
99
Repair and Maintenance
1.87x
72

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Dominant Cluster
Goods-Producing Cluster
Coherent grouping of concentrated sub-sectors, signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
1,761
Cluster Employment
2.94x
Peak LQ
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
Animal Production and Aquaculture
48.06x 343
Support Activities for Agriculture and Forestry
37.71x 378
Wood Product Manufacturing
18.08x 192
Gasoline Stations and Fuel Dealers
3.68x 102
General Merchandise Retailers
3.38x 289
Nursing and Residential Care Facilities
3.19x 289
2.94x 1,761
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing
2.89x 109
Truck Transportation
2.53x 99
Repair and Maintenance
1.87x 72

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, realistic diversification targets. Source: BLS QCEW
0.22x
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
62 employed
0.30x
Administrative and Support Services
67 employed
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Animal Production and Aquaculture concentrates at 48.06x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 10 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, suggesting an interconnected industrial base rather than reliance on a single employer or sector.
  • Attraction whitespace: 6 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Missaukee County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064
$170,400
Median Home Value vs 2019
$891
Rent/Mo
84.9%
Owner-Occ
31.9%
Vacancy
2.6x
Home Value to Income Ratio - Affordable
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026
Studio
$689/mo
1 Bedroom
$787/mo
2 Bedroom
$973/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,194/mo
4 Bedroom
$1,288/mo
30% of monthly median household income (~$1,655/mo) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Key Takeaways
  • Affordable market: Home value to income ratio of 2.6x is well below the ~4.1x national average; supports talent attraction and family settlement narratives.
  • High home ownership: 84.9% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 31.9% vacancy rate. In resort, rural, and seasonal markets much of this is recreational/seasonal (second homes), not available supply; confirm the vacancy-by-reason split before treating it as a redevelopment opportunity.
  • Broadly affordable rents: All 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom tiers sit below the 30%-of-median-income affordability threshold (~$1,655/mo), a clear cost-of-living advantage for workforce attraction.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23025, B08303, B08301
8,484
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 2 min below national avg
24.5 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
5.2%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
79%
of prime-age population
Labor force participation rate: 59.8% of working-age population (18-64) 60% Participation
▲ vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · College Scorecard
Bachelor's+
18.8%
HS Diploma+
91.1%
Regional / Statewide Institutions
Total credentials awarded
52,294/yr
University of Michigan-Ann Arbor 15,687/yr
Michigan State University 13,090/yr
Wayne State University 7,003/yr
Grand Valley State University 6,722/yr
Western Michigan University 5,086/yr
Oakland University 4,706/yr

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
27.4%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
28.6%
Service
15.3%
Sales & Office
20.1%
Construction / Maint.
15.1%
Production / Transport
20.9%
Bars scaled 2× for visual differentiation; percentage labels show actual share of 6,595 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 27.4% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Low participation: 59.8% labor force participation suggests untapped capacity; workforce development programs may unlock supply.
  • Talent pipeline: 6 regional institutions feed the workforce; the top three combined produce 35,780 annual credentials.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

AI-assisted analysis, drawn from 9 federal data sources

Sample AI Insight

Missaukee County shows strong potential for animal production and aquaculture attraction, with a 48.06x concentration and 343 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 27.4% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The interconnected base across animal production and aquaculture, support activities for agriculture and forestry, and wood product manufacturing creates supply-chain attraction leverage rather than single-employer risk, a structural advantage for industrial recruitment.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS (via FRED)2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026
College ScorecardAY 2022-23

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Missaukee County, Michigan, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Missaukee County, Michigan?

15,207 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Missaukee County, Michigan?

$66,194 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the unemployment rate in Missaukee County, Michigan?

5.7% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Missaukee County, Michigan?

$678M (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP1).