ExecutivePulse
Official Federal Data

Hood County, Texas

FIPS 48221 · Granbury, TX · Population 65,894
9 Sources Updated June 22, 2026
$88,160
Median Income
$80,734 national
4.3%
Unemployment
4% national
$3.6B
GDP
32.9%
Bachelor's+
35.7% national

Demographics & Population

Census Bureau American Community Survey 2020-2024 · 5-Year Estimates

Household Income

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
Median Household
$88,160
Per Capita
$43,607
Mean Household
$111,661
Poverty Rate
7.7%
Median Income Comparison
Hood County$88,160
Texas$78,476
National$80,734

Population Profile

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B02001, B03003
65+: 25.6% (16,840 residents) 55-64: 14.7% (9,704 residents) 35-54: 22.4% (14,731 residents) 18-34: 16.9% (11,152 residents) Under 18: 20.4% (13,467 residents) 46 Median Age
Cohorts
Under 18 · 20.4%
18-34 · 16.9%
35-54 · 22.4%
55-64 · 14.7%
65+ · 25.6%
Race & Ethnicity
White84.6%
Black or African American1.1%
Asian0.8%
Hispanic or Latino(any race)13.8%
Hispanic or Latino is an ethnic category and overlaps with the race categories above.

Educational Attainment

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · Population 25+
92.4%
High School+
National: 89.6%
▲ +2.8 pts
32.9%
Bachelor's+
National: 35.7%
▼ 2.8 pts
10.2%
Graduate+
National: 14.1%
▼ 3.9 pts

Employment Overview

Source: U.S. Census Bureau · American Community Survey 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates
65,894
Population
30,560
Labor Force
Employed
28,823
Unemployment Rate BLS LAUS 2025 annual
4.3%
Mean Commute 6 min above national avg
32.8 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
14.4%
Key Takeaways
  • Aging population: Median age of 46 is materially above the U.S. norm; succession planning and senior-services demand are real factors.

Economy & Industry

Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW · Bureau of Economic Analysis

$3.6B
Gross Domestic Product · 2024
Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis · CAGDP1 Regional GDP

Top Industries by Employment

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics · Quarterly Census of Employment & Wages 2025 Annual
Top industries by employment in Hood County, Texas, with employment, share of top sectors, and average wage
IndustryEmploymentShare of Top 10Avg Wage
1Retail Trade
3,084 21.7%
$39,228
2Health Care and Social Assistance
2,538 17.8%
$58,224
3Accommodation and Food Services
2,378 16.7%
$22,517
4Construction
1,532 10.8%
$74,936
5Manufacturing
1,365 9.6%
$68,276
6Administrative and Support and Waste Management
892 6.3%
$53,352
7Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
760 5.3%
$87,690
8Other Services (except Public Administration)
634 4.5%
$42,656
9Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction
560 3.9%
$94,768
10Finance and Insurance
494 3.5%
$72,609
Track industry shifts with AI

ExecutivePulse monitors WARN notices, BLS changes, and SEC filings for your top employers.

Learn More
Key Takeaways
  • Largest sector: Retail Trade employs 3,084 workers (21.7% of tracked sectors), at an average wage of $39,228.
  • Economic scale: Regional GDP of $3.6B (2024).
  • Wage stratification: Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction averages $94,768 while Accommodation and Food Services averages $22,517, a 4.2x spread in the same local economy, with implications for workforce development and talent strategy.
Source: BLS QCEW + BEA Regional GDP.
Seeing a change here?

EP customers get year-over-year deltas, WARN notices, and SEC filings for every sector tracked above, surfaced as proactive alerts, not after-the-fact news.

Get Deeper Trends

Industry Concentration

Location Quotient measures regional specialization vs. national average. LQ > 1.0 = concentrated.

Location Quotient Analysis

Concentrated Industries
Source: BLS QCEW · 3-digit NAICS sub-sector · Location Quotient vs. national employment share
Same source as the Top Industries table above, sub-sector view surfaces the specialization the supersector view masks (e.g., Plastics & Rubber Manufacturing inside the Manufacturing supersector).
Support Activities for Mining
10.65x
342
Textile Product Mills
8.75x
98
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
3.49x
498
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
3.05x
152
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.60x
429
Waste Management and Remediation Services
2.23x
139
Food and Beverage Retailers
2.11x
825
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
2.10x
518
Utilities
1.97x
143
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.87x
431

Cluster Depth

Source: BLS QCEW · Sub-sectors with LQ ≥ 1.5 indicate genuine cluster concentration
Dominant Cluster
Retail Trade Cluster
Coherent grouping of concentrated sub-sectors, signals supply-chain fit for site selectors
1,772
Cluster Employment
2.60x
Peak LQ
Concentrated Sub-Sectors
Support Activities for Mining
10.65x 342
Textile Product Mills
8.75x 98
Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
3.49x 498
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
3.05x 152
Building Material and Garden Supply Retailers
2.60x 429
Waste Management and Remediation Services
2.23x 139
Food and Beverage Retailers
2.11x 825
Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
2.10x 518
Utilities
1.97x 143
Amusement, Gambling, and Recreation Industries
1.87x 431

Attraction Opportunities

LQ < 0.5 with ≥ 50 employed, realistic diversification targets. Source: BLS QCEW
0.32x
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
67 employed
0.34x
Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable Goods
91 employed
0.40x
Educational Services
158 employed
Key Takeaways
  • Top specialization: Support Activities for Mining concentrates at 10.65x the national norm, top-decile concentration, the kind of signature sector that defines a region's economic identity to site selectors.
  • Cluster depth: 10 sub-sectors register LQ ≥ 1.5, suggesting an interconnected industrial base rather than reliance on a single employer or sector.
  • Attraction whitespace: 8 sub-sectors register LQ < 0.5, candidates for diversification or recruitment depending on labor-market fit.
Source: BLS QCEW sub-sector Location Quotients.
Hood County's Top Sectors by Workforce Share
Each rectangle's area is proportional to that sector's share of total private-sector employment across all NAICS supersectors. Hover for exact employment.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics QCEW 2025 Annual · Private sector, NAICS supersectors

Housing & Affordability

Census ACS · HUD Fair Market Rents FY2026

Housing Overview

Source: Census Bureau ACS 2020-2024 5-Year Estimates · Tables B25001, B25077, B25064
$306,400
Median Home Value vs 2019
$1,428
Rent/Mo
81.2%
Owner-Occ
12.2%
Vacancy
3.5x
Home Value to Income Ratio
vs. ~4.1x national average

HUD Fair Market Rents

Source: HUD · Fair Market Rents FY2026
Studio
$1,098/mo
1 Bedroom
$1,237/mo
2 Bedroom
$1,412/mo
3 Bedroom
$1,693/mo
4 Bedroom
$2,196/mo
30% of monthly median household income (~$2,204/mo) · rents above this line are typically considered cost-burdened.
Key Takeaways
  • In line with national: Home value to income ratio of 3.5x sits near the ~4.1x national average; affordability is neither a clear advantage nor a recruitment friction.
  • High home ownership: 81.2% owner-occupied; rental supply may be tight for incoming workers.
  • Elevated vacancy: 12.2% vacancy rate. In resort, rural, and seasonal markets much of this is recreational/seasonal (second homes), not available supply; confirm the vacancy-by-reason split before treating it as a redevelopment opportunity.
  • Broadly affordable rents: All 5 HUD Fair Market Rent bedroom tiers sit below the 30%-of-median-income affordability threshold (~$2,204/mo), a clear cost-of-living advantage for workforce attraction.
Source: Census ACS housing tables + HUD Fair Market Rents.

Workforce Pipeline

Labor force readiness, commuting, and workforce composition

Labor Market Overview

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Tables B01001, B23025, B08303, B08301
35,587
Working Age (18-64) vs 2019
Mean Commute 6 min above national avg
32.8 min
Work From Home vs 15.1% national
14.4%
Prime-Age Employed (25-54)
80.1%
of prime-age population
Labor force participation rate: 58.3% of working-age population (18-64) 58% Participation
▲ vs 2019

Education & Talent Pipeline

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table B15003 · College Scorecard
Bachelor's+
32.9%
HS Diploma+
92.4%
Regional / Statewide Institutions
Total credentials awarded
79,681/yr
Texas A&M University-College Station 20,117/yr
The University of Texas at Austin 17,432/yr
Lone Star College System 11,449/yr
Dallas College 10,913/yr
University of Houston 10,852/yr
Texas State University 8,918/yr

Aging Workforce

Source: Census Bureau ACS · Derived from age & employment tables
27.3%
55-64 of working-age population (18-64)
Elevated retirement risk, above the 20% threshold. Succession planning recommended.

Workforce by Occupation

Source: Census ACS 2020-2024 · Table C24010 · Civilian employed population 16+
Management / Professional
40.5%
Service
13.1%
Sales & Office
22.9%
Construction / Maint.
10.2%
Production / Transport
13.3%
Bars scaled 2× for visual differentiation; percentage labels show actual share of 28,823 employed workers.
Key Takeaways
  • Succession risk is real: 27.3% of working-age residents are 55-64. Plan for retirements over the next decade and pair attraction strategy with talent retention.
  • Low participation: 58.3% labor force participation suggests untapped capacity; workforce development programs may unlock supply.
  • Talent pipeline: 6 regional institutions feed the workforce; the top three combined produce 48,998 annual credentials.
Source: ACS workforce data and College Scorecard.

AI Insights

AI-assisted analysis, drawn from 9 federal data sources

Sample AI Insight

Hood County shows strong potential for support activities for mining attraction, with a 10.65x concentration and 342 jobs in this sub-sector. It ranks in the top decile nationally. Near-term succession risk is elevated, with 27.3% of the working-age population within 10 years of retirement age.

The interconnected base across support activities for mining, textile product mills, and heavy and civil engineering construction creates supply-chain attraction leverage rather than single-employer risk, a structural advantage for industrial recruitment.

Industry Shift Analysis

Manufacturing Automation Risk
High
Healthcare Growth Forecast
+4.2% CAGR
Remote Work Migration
67/100

Prospect Match Scores

Advanced Manufacturing
92/100
Life Sciences
84/100
Data Centers
71/100
Illustrative example

Take it further

AI Insights: Built into ExecutivePulse. Continuous analysis tied to your own pipeline: industry-shift signals, prospect matches, retention prompts.

Managed Services: Prefer to hand it off? Our team delivers the analysis and consulting for you.

Schedule a Demo
Available as premium offerings.

Data Sources

Updated from official federal government data.

Census ACS 5-Year2024
BLS QCEW2025 annual
BLS LAUS (via FRED)2025 annual
BEA Regional GDP2024
Census CBP2023
HUD Fair Market RentsFY2026
FCC Broadband Map2024
USAspending.govFY2026
College ScorecardAY 2022-23

Frequently Asked Questions

Key economic and demographic figures for Hood County, Texas, from federal data sources.

What is the population of Hood County, Texas?

65,894 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the median household income in Hood County, Texas?

$88,160 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS 5-Year Estimates).

What is the unemployment rate in Hood County, Texas?

4.3% (2025 annual average, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, LAUS).

What is the GDP of Hood County, Texas?

$3.6B (U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, CAGDP1).